At a press conference last week, a reporter asked President Joe Biden, "Why did the Ukraine-FBI informant file refer to you as 'the big guy'?"
Biden replied, "Why'd you ask such a dumb question?"
I don't know, sir. Maybe it's because you were referred to as 'the big guy' who was slated to receive 10% of potential profits from a joint venture between members of your family and Chinese energy giant CEFC in an email found on your son's laptop, and because one of his former business partners, Tony Bobulinski, has gone on the record to say you are 1,000% 'the big guy.
The big burning question about the Biden bribery document that will make all the difference is whether or not Joe Biden used his position as Vice President to pressure Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son, Hunter Biden. The document in question is a whistleblower complaint that was filed in 2019, and it alleges that Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees from Ukraine unless they fired Viktor Shokin, the prosecutor general at the time. Shokin was investigating Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas company on whose board Hunter Biden served.
The whistleblower complaint has been the subject of much controversy, with some people alleging that it is a legitimate document that proves that Joe Biden engaged in corrupt behavior, while others have dismissed it as a partisan attack. The Trump administration has refused to release the full whistleblower complaint, citing concerns about national security, but some details of the complaint have been leaked to the press.
One of the most important questions about the Biden bribery document is whether or not Joe Biden actually threatened to withhold the loan guarantees from Ukraine. The whistleblower complaint alleges that he did, but there is no clear evidence to support this claim. Some people have argued that Biden's actions were justified because Shokin was a corrupt prosecutor who was not doing his job. Others have argued that Biden's actions were inappropriate and that he may have abused his power.
Another important question about the Biden bribery document is whether or not Hunter Biden's position on the Burisma board created a conflict of interest for Joe Biden. The whistleblower complaint alleges that it did, but there is no clear evidence to support this claim. Some people have argued that Hunter Biden's position on the Burisma board was not a conflict of interest because he was not involved in the company's day-to-day operations. Others have argued that Hunter Biden's position on the Burisma board created a clear conflict of interest for Joe Biden, and that he should have recused himself from any decisions involving Ukraine.
The Biden bribery document is a complex and controversial issue, and there are many unanswered questions. The document has the potential to make a major difference in the 2020 presidential election, and it will be interesting to see how it plays out in the months to come.
In the meantime, the big burning question about the Biden bribery document is whether or not Joe Biden used his position as Vice President to pressure Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son. The answer to this question could have a major impact on the 2020 presidential election, and it is one that the American people deserve to know.
It is important to note that the Biden bribery document is just one piece of evidence in a larger investigation into Joe Biden's actions in Ukraine. The investigation is still ongoing, and it is possible that more evidence will come to light in the future. However, the Biden bribery document is a significant piece of evidence, and it raises serious questions about Joe Biden's conduct.
The American people deserve to know the truth about what happened in Ukraine, and they deserve to know whether or not Joe Biden used his position for personal gain. The Biden bribery document is a major step towards getting to the truth, and it will be interesting to see how the investigation unfolds in the months to come.
0 Comments